Peanut Butter Experiment

The following article was in an email from The K-House eNews for October 19, 2010.

K-House is 'short' for Koinonia House located at P.O. Box D, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83816.

To visit their website, Click Here.

This is a very interesting article and definitely something to think about the next time you

open a jar of peanut butter or a sealed jar of anything for that matter.

THE PEANUT BUTTER EXPERIMENT

The next time you open a brand-new jar of jam, jelly, or peanut butter, let's find out how good of a scientist you are!

Our entire culture - our science, our social structure, and our educational system - is based on the premise of biogenesis: that

matter + energy = new life (at least on rare occasions)

Let's conduct an experiment. Take a new (unopened) jar of jam, jelly, or even peanut butter - direct from the supermarket shelf - and examine it carefully.

Notice that it is an "open" thermodynamic system: energy can enter and leave the container as it is exposed to different temperatures. (In fact, the container is probably also optically transparent, but that is incidental to our purposes here.)

According to the dogmas of the current high priests of biology (and other venerated elders of our society), occasionally, if you combine matter and energy, it is possible to yield new life forms. The accepted theory is that even inorganic matter, subjected to totally random processes, originally combined itself into an initial life form, from which all subsequent life evolved.

Let's now open the sealed jar and carefully examine the contents inside. Did you find any "new life"?

Of course not! (And aren't you glad!) Our example even contains organic material, which contributes an unfavorable bias to our null hypothesis (a handicap, as it were), but even that, too, helps establish our basic point. To attempt to use inorganic materials in such a container further clinches our conclusion: did we really evolve from a rock and some water?

The equation implied by our current priesthoods of science is erroneous: the underlying equation is incomplete.

matter + energy ≠ new life

matter + energy + information = new life

Unless there is introduced information, from an external source - a spore, or some other essential contaminant - no "new life" will ever be found. Ever.

Every day, for over a hundred years, we have continually conducted billions of experiments analogous to the one above and we never find any "new" life forms. Our entire food industry depends upon the fact that, unless an impurity is introduced, no "new life" is ever found.

We now know that even the "simplest" cells are more complex than a city filled with automated factories-building, manipulating, adjusting, growing. And they can do something that our factories cannot do: they can replicate their entire complexity in a matter of a few hours! We are just beginning to understand the nature of the three-out-of-four, error-correcting, digital coding structure used to coordinate the entire operation: the DNA code.

Scientists recognize that spontaneous generation does not occur. It's common knowledge. Yet, in order to leave God out of the picture, somewhere, somehow in our physical world, life would have had to develop magically on its own. The Darwinists cannot explain the origin of life because they cannot explain the origin of the information necessary! They accept on faith that the complexity of the living cell and its digital code of DNA somehow produced itself without the aid of a Designer.

Take a leaf off a tree or a flower from the garden; examine almost any living thing under a microscope, and you are inescapably confronted with the evidence of design: elegant, skilled craftsmanship that remains virtually unparalleled by man. Biologists claim that this design is an illusion, that it is the result of natural selection and survival of the fittest acting on organisms over countless generations. However, they cannot explain where the digital information in the DNA came from in the first place. Natural selection can only filter already existing DNA.

Virtually every field of science - except biology - has recognized the entropy laws which refute the possible emergence of design in the absence of external input. Microbiology has now put the final nails into Darwin's coffin.

Every time you open a fresh, new jar of some food item, and don't find evidence of "new life," you have conducted an empirical experiment which refutes the common superstition which continues to be promoted by the orthodox witch doctors of biogenesis: that life occurred without the involvement of a master designer. This, of course, also exposes the real motives of the vested priesthood: prostituting their avowed "seeking of truth" to their committed resolve to avoid any accountability to a Creator.