Reports on Meetings

LymeNet Newsletter

Volume: 2 Issue: 20 Date: 02-Dec-94

Table of Contents:

I. NIAID: Summary Of Second Consultation On Chronic LD

II. NIAID: Recent Projects at Rocky Mountain Labs

III. ANTIMICROB AGENTS CHEMOTHER: In vitro activity of

vancomycin against the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi

IV. About The LymeNet Newsletter

Newsletter:

***********************************************************************

* The National Lyme Disease Network *

* LymeNet Newsletter *

***********************************************************************

IDX# Volume 2 - Number 20 - 12/02/94

IDX# INDEX

IDX#

IDX# I. NIAID: Summary Of Second Consultation On Chronic LD

IDX# II. NIAID: Recent Projects at Rocky Mountain Labs

IDX# III. ANTIMICROB AGENTS CHEMOTHER: In vitro activity of

IDX# vancomycin against the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi

IDX# IV. About The LymeNet Newsletter

IDX#

I. NIAID: Summary Of Second Consultation On Chronic LD

---------------------------------------------------------

Sender: Edward McSweegan <EM8P@NIH.GOV>

On October 18, NIAID convened a second informal meeting on chronic

Lyme disease (LD). The discussion focused on possible clinical

trial designs for chronic LD, infectious and non-infectious aspects

of chronic LD, and potentially important co-infecting microorganisms

in some cases of chronic LD. The meeting also served to provide the

NIAID with a better understanding of the biomedical, logistical and

analytical issues involved in carrying out a treatment trial for

chronic LD. As noted at the first meeting on January 31, a

fundamental question about chronic LD is whether the lingering signs

and symptoms of post-treatment LD are due to persistent infection by

Borrelia burgdorferi or to non-infectious sequelae. Furthermore, if

persistent infection is common, is it antibiotic-responsive?

The answers to these questions are critical to guiding the care and

treatment of patients with evidence of chronic LD.

For purposes of the meeting, the term Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome

(PLDS) was used to describe a condition of chronic or intermittent

signs and symptoms coincident with the time of infection and

persisting for six months to years despite documentation of

appropriate antibiotic therapy. PLDS was further characterized by

symptoms of cognitive disturbances (encephalopathy), chronic fatigue

and malaise, headache, and joint and muscle pain. The PLDS concept

was useful for discussing chronic LD and for outlining various

etiologic considerations, including; persistent infection, incorrect

diagnosis, slow resolution of signs and symptoms, residual damage

from infection, re-infection, unmasking of a prior pathology, and a

post-infectious immune or inflammatory process.

Given the varied clinical presentations and possible etiologies

associated with PLDS, most of the meeting participants concluded

that an initial trial should focus on a well-defined patient

population with probable infection that might respond to antibiotics.

The use of an antibiotic-responsive or microbiologic case definition

in an antibiotic treatment trial would also simplify entry criteria,

endpoint and outcome measures, and reduce the necessary study size.

Entry criteria for such a treatment trial might include objective

measures such as positive serologies, a history of tick bite or EM

rash, compatible clinical signs and symptoms, repetitive positive

PCRs, positive culture, and severe fatigue (> 6 months) after

appropriate antibiotic therapy.

The use of a placebo was also thought by many participants to be

essential in measuring the efficacy of an antibiotic treatment.

The use of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

would allow investigators to determine if the antibiotic-treated

group improved significantly over the placebo group. Subsequent to

such a determination it would be possible to ask other questions

about optimal treatment duration, optimal drug route and optimal

drug choice.

The meeting participants noted, however, that it would be

unacceptable to enroll a placebo group into a treatment trial,

based on their likelihood of being infected, without eventually

treating them as aggressively as the antibiotic-treated group.

Various approaches, such as a cross-over and parallel track trial

designs, were discussed as ways of ensuring proper patient care

throughout the duration of a treatment study.

An initial well-designed treatment trial involving a select

population of PLDS patients would provide new information about

treating chronic LD and suggest additional avenues of patient care

and research. Most investigators recognized that in the absence of

a sufficient number of infected patients who had never been treated,

no particular group of LD patients would be uniform and ideal for a

given treatment trial. It was also noted that a patient group with

probable infection represented only the apex of a pyramid of PLDS

patients with varying clinical presentations and possible etiologies.

However, the intention of a first treatment trial would be to ask

treatment and diagnostic questions in one well-defined patient group

in the hope that the resulting answers could eventually be applied

to others.

A report of the October 18 meeting will be presented to the NIAID

Council at its next meeting in February 1995.

Chronic Lyme Disease: Clinical Trial Considerations

---------------------------------------------------

Chairman - Steve Schutzer, M.D., Dept. of Medicine, UMDNJ. Med. Sch.

Janice I. Beers, J.D., L.D. Assoc. of the U.S.

William Blackwelder, Ph.D., Chief, Biometry, DMID/NIAID, NIH

Carl Brenner, L.D. Coalition of NY

Patricia Coyle, M.D., Dept. of Neurology, SUNY

George Curlin, M.D., Deputy Director, DMID/NIAID, NIH

Raymond Dattwyler, M.D., Div. Allergy, Rheum. & Clinical Immuno.

SUNY Sch. of Med.

Charlene DeMarco, M.D., Private Practice

David Dennis, M.D., Div. Vector-Borne Inf. Dis., CDC/NCID

Jesse Goodman, M.D., Div. of Medicine, U. of Minnesota

Stephen Heyse, M.D., Director, OPECA/NIAMS, NIH

Benjamin Luft, M.D., Div. of Inf. Dis., SUNY Sch. of Med.

Robin McKenzie, M.D., Lab. Clin. Invest., NIAID, NIH

David H. Persing, M.D., Lab. Med. Patho., Mayo Foundation

Robert Quackenbush, Ph.D., Chief, BMB/DMID/NIAID, NIH

Alfred J. Saah, M.D., School of Hygiene & Pub. Hlth, Johns Hopkins U.

Susana Serrate-Sztein, Ph.D., NIAMS, NIH

Janice M. Soreth, M.D., Div. Anti-Infective Drug Prod., NIH

Allen Steere, M.D., N.E. Med. Ctr., Rheumatology/Immunology

David L. Weld, Exec. Dir., American Lyme Disease Foundation Inc.

Edward McSweegan, Ph.D., NIAID

CONTACT: Edward McSweegan, Ph.D.

Lyme Disease Program Officer

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Solar Bldg., Rm. 3A34

Bethesda, MD 20892-7630

301-496-7728

301-402-2508 (fax)

EM8P@NIH.GOV

=====*=====