Seb Parr

Here are Seb Parr's comments on the questionnaire

Would you actively pursue policies that would enable utility cycling to develop along the lines that have made it the transportation mode of choice for so many in Copenhagen?

For Christchurch to become ‘Copenhagenised’ would require a dedicated and systematic campaign by someone passionate about the future of utility cycling. Personally, rather than actively promoting the policies myself, I would approach each proposed law change on a case-by-case basis. There are some aspects to your plan that I am sympathetic to (i.e. helmet laws) and some that I would oppose (i.e. contra-flow rights for cyclists). I would also be careful to ensure that any new laws were not enacted to the detriment of motor vehicles, which are a vital and intrinsic part of our economy and lifestyle. In all honesty, I wouldn’t be the best bet for promoting a dramatic change to cycling laws etc.

Would you lobby to rescind the law that compels cyclists to wear helmets in order to make it discretionary on the rider?

This is a position I am quite sympathetic to. I strongly believe in the freedom of the individual, and am always very uncomfortable whenever government mandates something on us. I would look at supporting moves to (although not actively lobbying) make helmets discretionary for riders over the age of 18. I wouldn’t support, however, moves to rescind the law with regard to children – most children and teenagers wouldn’t wear helmets as they are not ‘cool’, and as I result I think many children’s lives would end unnecessarily in disability or death. With regard to adults, however, I think we may have some common ground.

Would you give preference to establishing a comprehensive network of cycle

lanes over retaining curbside parking for cars?

In all honesty no. Without easy access to curb side parking, many areas of our city would struggle (i.e. central city) in terms of both economics and convenience. I can particularly imagine that without adequate parking around the central city, the entire area would suffer. Retail and businesses would suffer tremendously, and the stress of more and more people abandoning shopping in town and heading out to suburban malls would be crippling. People who work in the central city without paid-parking passes, would also find commuting a struggle. Although I realise these comprehensive lanes would benefit cycling greatly, I feel the inconvenience to the majority of commuters travelling by car would be disproportionately unfair. I guess at the end of the day, however, it would depend greatly on what extent of replacement we were talking about.

Would you lobby to rescind the law which prohibits cyclists from using

pavements

( at least as an interim measure for the years it will otherwise take to

establish real separation from motorized vehicles)

to enable 'slow' cyclists ( e.g.the elderly )to take up utility cycling.

Again I have to be honest and say no. I believe pedestrians need dedicated walkways where they do not have to be constantly vigilant for hazards etc. Many people, particularly the elderly, children and people travelling in groups would find it difficult (and perhaps at times stressful) to have bikes coming past them. The other thing to consider is the fact that while skilled riders like yourself could easily avoid and judge obstacles, such as pedestrians, wheelie bins, kids, reversing cars, pets etc, there would equally be many riders who would not be able to. In short, I think footpath riding would lead to many accidents.

Would you actively work to set up a campaign to educate the pubic about and

promote the types of bicycles and technologies appropriate to utility

cycling?

It would depend on one key factor – the cost to the ratepayer proportionate with the demand for the promotion. If large numbers of people were keen to take up utility cycling (as there could well be), then it would be council’s responsibility to inform people of the details of the new laws, and perhaps information about what equipment is required etc. The council I believe would have to be careful not to make a value judgement as to the merits of cycling, as the argument could be equally made that council should promote the types of motor vehicles available and their relevant fuel costs etc. Again, however, if large numbers of people would be interested in taking up utility cycling as a result of law changes, then they would need to be informed.

Would you lobby for the installation of bike racks on ALL public transport

vehicles ?

I think that is a good idea, and if the demand is there for that service then I would support such a move.

Do you cycle yourself? - And if not at this stage in your life, what would

it take to get you to take up 'utility' cycling in the future ?

I don’t cycle at the moment, although I did when I was a kid. The couple of times I have taken a bike ride in recent years I have enjoyed it, and it is certainly a refreshing experience from sitting inside a car all day. That said, I wouldn’t be likely to take up utility cycling as I enjoy the convenience that car travel affords (including the ability to carry multiple passengers). I also have a personal interest in cars, so I would always hope to own and drive one.

Would you recommend that other people (children/ the elderly) cycle?

Why? / Why not?

Yes, as cycling clearly has many health benefits. I think kids can learn a lot about independence and responsibility through cycling, and people of all ages can experience great health benefits. I take my hat off to people who cycle, as it does take stamina and fitness. At the end of the day I believe people should have the freedom of choice over their method of transportation, and that both cycles and cars should be supported by a council dedicated to ensuring Christchurch is a city with convenient transportation facilities, no matter what one drives.

Thanks again for your email Alan, and I hope I’ve answered your questions to a full extent. I realise we perhaps sit on different spectrums with regard to bicycle transportation, although I also hope that I’ve emphasised the respect I have for your position, and the fact that I would fully support riders/drivers of all forms of transport.

Please email me if you have any more questions or comments!

Thanks again,

Have a great weekend!

Seb Parr

Community Board Candidate

Back