Military Experts
Government Science
The U.S. government has known there are biological effects from electromagnetic radiation for decades. In the U.S. and elsewhere, evidence of harm was suppressed and non-protective standards were set, falling back on the excuse that more research needs to be done before those standards will be updated.
In science, when there is evidence of harm, protocol states that we stop, conduct research until it can be proven safe, then resume public use. This is called the Precautionary Principle. Some countries invoked the Precautionary Principle decades ago to protect their citizens from non-ionizing, non-thermal microwave radiation when evidence came to light that we don't need to heat tissue to cause damage. Our U.S. standards are set at this high thermal level, but damage is being done at microwave radiation levels far, far lower than the standards. This is not regulated by our government and the public is therefore not protected.
Unfortunately, our engineers, scientists, doctors and physicists are taught in school that microwave radiation harm can only happen if there is tissue heating (called the thermal effect). The following body of evidence was not considered when our FCC standards were set back in 1996, and it is therefore difficult for our current professionals to understand that the wireless technology products they are producing are biologically harmful.
These documents have since been unclassified:
The U.S. Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency Office of the Surgeon General published the following report in 1976. It speaks to early international research on Blood, Cardiovascular System, Cells, Central Nervous System, Digestive System, Glands, Metabolism, Reproduction, Visual Systems and Internal Sound Perception: https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Defense-Intelligence-Agency-1976-Report-on-Biological-Effects-of-EMF.pdf
CIA Translations on USSR Science and Technology Biomedical Sciences, Effects of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation, 1977, includes, among other studies, Biological Effects of Millimeter Radiowaves on p. 61:
alpaca-chinchilla-x6xf.squarespace.com/s/CIA-Declassified-USSR-Translation-Nonionizing-EMR-Effects-1977.pdfNASA issued the following report in 1981. See page 30 for many of the symptoms that are being categorized as electrohypersensitivity today: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810017132.pdf
This Army Intelligence document from 1998 identifies ways in which electromagnetic radiation was being considered for warfare: http://refusesmartmeter.com/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf
The Naval Military Research Institute issued the following report in 1972. It too classifies the many known biological effects on man: https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Naval-MRI-Glaser-Report-1976.pdf
The Moscow Signal Experiment also indicates our military was knowledgeable of the harm caused by EMFs as early as 1962, long before this technology was deployed in the commercial sector.
The history of the Moscow Signal has received renewed media attention in recent months as a potential historical precedent for the 'Havana Syndrome'. See The Moscow Signals Declassified: Microwave Diplomacy, 1967-1977:
www.saferemr.com/2021/11/the-havana-syndrome.htmlThis 2018 public document explains U.S. military plans for 5G via the Electromagnetic Defense Task Force:
Military Experts Speak Out
Military experts from around the world who have worked with this technology for warfare are speaking out about the serious dangers of exposing the general population to microwave radiation emitted by wi-fi devices.
Retired U.S. Government Physicist Dr. Ron Powell, from Maryland, has authored several papers to help consumers and public agencies understand the implications including illness symptoms, questions to ask your energy company, FCC limits, a ranking of smart utility meter types and more:
Dr. Powell has issued open letters for schools and libraries to begin protecting their citizens:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/300834441/Message-to-Public-Libraries-About-Wireless-Devices-and-Health
Retired Captain Jerry Flynn served in the Canadian military for 26 years specializing in wireless radio systems, radiowarfare and electronic warfare. He provides a history of military knowledge of harm from electromagnetic radiation, and why he is gravely concerned for the rollout of smart utility meters and the rest of our wireless devices: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-F3nf47kAs
Independent journalist Jack O'Dwyer published a summary of Jerry Flynn's concerns in the 2016 article, "Governments, Authorities Ignore 60+ Years of Dangers of Wi-Fi": http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/6595/2016-03-28/governments-authorities-ignore-60-years-dangers-wi-fi.html
Military pilots are seeing an increase in cancers from the sun's ionizing radiation and the interior of the plane's non-ionizing man-made radiation exposures: americanmilitarynews.com/2019/08/we-are-dropping-like-flies-ex-fighter-pilots-push-for-earlier-cancer-screenings/
See this article on the need to halt 5G by the Microwave Injured Veterans Network: https://www.microwavedvets.com/virus?fbclid=IwAR0s1FyRALvi47jgDQL_mNR5IRn-cWqXLZ7DdMPqXkiMjY6HQW09wENHZwA
Barrie Trower, a former physicist with the British Royal Navy and expert in radiation, explains in the following two-part lecture the dangers of using wi-fi radiation. He is particularly concerned for the welfare of children and fetuses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xgJmeQaQmc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhcuSEHVOSM
Note: The information provided here is publicly available on the Internet.
It is intended to provide a starting point to inform you of EMF dangers.
Please do your own research, draw your own conclusions, and act accordingly to protect those you love.