Leon
Trotsky: Remarks on Our General Orientation
Late
1934 or Early 1935
[Writing
of Leon Trotsky, Vol. 14, New York 1979, p. 560 f.]
No
one among us doubts the correctness of our general orientation. The
only question is whether the tempo of events confirms this
orientation. To this we reply:
a.
Political forecasts can never pretend to fix in advance the tempo
of events.
b.
Our assessment was not only a forecast
but above all a warning:
workers, events can
develop very rapidly, we must prepare. We are dealing not with
astronomy but with revolutionary action.
c.
Nothing has happened yet to indicate that the tempo of events has
moderated for an entire period. The lull can be fleeting, we do not
yet know what this winter will bring.
The
immediate perspective could change seriously only on one condition —
that the economic conjuncture improves. All classes orient themselves
for the moment toward that perspective. If the next months show an
increase in economic activity on a world scale, that would affect the
political situation in France very materially, even if France lags
behind economically, which is almost inevitable. Improvement of the
conjuncture would not change our general orientation but it would
change the pace and the stages, which is very important for practical
work. Improvement of the conjuncture would create a favorable basis
for immediate demands and would thus unloose a wave of strikes,
reinforce the trade unions, etc. For us that would mean an additional
period for education, for preparation on the basis of the everyday
activity of the masses.
If
the crisis is continued or aggravated, disappointment will take more
acute forms among all the classes, even in the very near future.
Flandin’s corporatism does not change very much. He himself may be
swept away by a new “explosion” like that of February 6. Under
such conditions, fascist reaction, like the revolution, will have a
new and powerful impulsion.
It
seems to me that today, like yesterday, we must stress this last
possibility and draw all the political consequences. At the same time
we must keep our hand on the pulse of the country’s economy in
order to recognize changes in time. A comrade should be specially
assigned to study the economic conjuncture in connection with the
activity of the capitalists and the strike movements.
In
any case, it must be foreseen that any new “prosperity” will be
very unstable and, giving rise to great hopes, will be followed by a
new crisis, perhaps more acute than the present one, and that this
new crisis will have enormous and almost immediate political
consequences. It should be well understood that this epoch, with its
social instability and economic changes, brings profound political
repercussions, which, despite their instability, are proof of the
tension of class relations.