IMWR_References
The references to my work Illuminati Manifesto of World Revolution by Nicholas Bonneville -- my translation with over 300 pages of historical material on the Illuminati in the French Revolution -- has been mentioned a few times on the Internet. Sometimes it makes it appear I endorse something I do not. I will mention that below.
So I will here address that for the record.
Agorism Is On the Radical Left (February 2013) -- blog by Neil.
I was grateful to see this blog, because it understands the point of IMWR. He uses to support Agorism -- which is fine with me.... He defines Agorism as a movement to return the:
"Left to its radical anti-state, anti-war, pro-property, pro-market historical roots." (Agorist Class Theory, 10/38).
Then he discusses IMWR in a proper way:
I stumbled across a book entitled Illuminati: Manifesto of World Revolution (1792) in the course of my research. The author is Nicholas Bonneville. Marco Di Luchetti is the translator, editor, and introduction writer. This book is of supreme interest because it “allows a correct identification of the ideology of the group known in history as the Brissotins.” The Brissotins are relevant to my discussion because they were the first group in history to be called “Left”:
It was during Brissot’s mastery over the Jacobins from 1791 to August 1792 that Jacobin deputies in the Assembly began the practice of seating themselves to the left of the President’s Chair. Gradually, this behavior caused others to spot a “left” and “right” wing. This behavior is the genesis of our modern distinction of “left” and “right.”
My thesis is: when the agorist authors refer to their “historical roots” in the “radical Left,” they mean, in part, roots in the ideology of the Brissotins.
I plan to expand upon this statement in Part 2. I want to assure you that I am not doing crazy “conspiracy theory” research. This is serious historical research on the French Revolution.
To lure you into reading Part 2, let me very briefly hint at the similarities between radical “Left” agorism and the Brissotin ideology.
Brissotin Political Philosophy:
Bonneville wanted to create a world “without any state to rule over the people. It was utterly libertarian” (Kindle Locations 133).
Brissotin Economics:
In 1793, the Cercle Social [the Brissotins were all members of Bonneville’s Cercle Social] specifically endorsed giving freedom to farmers to sell their goods at market prices... It was only during the Enlightenment that experiments were made to let individuals, unrestrained by state intervention, freely supply markets. When monarchical state controls were removed, supply flourished. When reimposed, supply contracted. (See Kindle Locations 276-281)
I read some of Neil's other articles, and he 'gets it.' Neil writes:
Socialism is the system of exploitation, not laissez-faire. Socialism is a system of tyranny. Socialism will lead to the progressive pauperizing of the laboring classes; capitalism will pour a horn of plenty out on them. ("Tyranny of Socialism.")
Marco D.
Truthstream Media 2013
http://truthstreammedia.com/washington-warned-illuminati-infiltrating-revolution-2/
The author writes:
Illuminati Manifesto of World Revolution by Marco de Luchetti, technically a forward to conspirator of the French Revolution Nicholas Bonneville’s 1792 book L’Esprit Des Religions, explains how the French secret society/publisher Le Cercle Social housed the key French members of the Bavarian Illuminati who carried out a definite conspiracy via the French Revolution. Included among the key backers of this Illuminati conspiracy are the Rothschild family, who bankrolled founder Adam Weishaupt, the Saxe-Gotha family who protected Weishaupt after the secret group was exposed, as well as the Marquis de Lafayette, who served as a general in the American Revolution and as a leader of the Garde Nationale in the French Revolution.
The red highlighted portion is not in my book. I also believe it is inaccurate. Jews were excluded from the Illuminati, as mentioned in a letter between Weishaupt and Philo.
Then the author restates correctly some of my points. So in fairness I will quote them:
The French branch of the Illuminati comprised a distinct faction inside the Jacobins via a political cadre generally referred to as the Girondins; this group was later overpowerd by the Montagnards (also Jacobins), as detailed at length by Luchetti. He argues that under the leadership of Robespierre, they took over and bloodied the revolution already underway, carrying out not only the executions of thousands of aristocrats and clergy members, but exacting also a larger depopulation effort, particularly among the plebiscites.
Luchetti documents how an effort had been declared to wipe out 2/3 of all of France, aiming to eradicate some 16 million people from the nearly 25 million who comprised France’s population at the time. From page 337:
Two thirds of the citizens are villains: the enemies of liberty. They ought to be exterminated. Terror is the Supreme Law. It is the instrument to aid us. It is an object of veneration. Destruction must be constantly the order of the day. If the sword ceases to operate, if the executioners do not serve as fathers of their country, liberty is at risk. It wants to reign over a pile of cadavers, watered by the blood of its enemies.
This macabre effort was underway, resulting in more than a million dead through starvation (the food supply was artificially constrained and centralized), fire, famine and the sword. It ended only when Robespierre’s dark revolution was overthrown and he was executed without trial via the same guillotines he had been using to carry out his terror.
That's ok.
The Brissotins were the first to be called left-wing politicians. (Kindle Locations 226-229, 235)
