Potentilla cuneata


Potentilla cuneata Wallich ex Lehmann, Nov. Stirp. Pug. 3: 34. 1831. (syn: Potentilla ambigua Cambessèdes; Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol.; P. dolichopogon H. Léveillé) as per FOC & FON and as per efi thread;

Five Finger Cinquefoil, Cuneate cinquefoil;  



2 posts by 2 authors. Attachments (2)
Potentilla cuneata.
To me it also goes to P. cuneifolia Bertol. as in the earlier thread (your upload of P.eriocarpa).
 
 
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6fb025be36bd6467/IMG_3747.jpg?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrEPyGd2ny9x0kSmyUGmdrrT2ILHiVcLolr5693PMFO8PgCDpBRaa10L07RersrPUs5fi25-SWtOAjP7LDWCr_HzIsqNHhuKKbYbprF0Lue_UYpo2MU
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6fb025be36bd6467/IMG_3751.jpg?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrHnQWJWslRP-jkFKnYboORRx2wrwH1FGdjgO_5gF0O4-ojpenXp7cjHJhaLb82PV6aBAys31Rki3A6DVCs-H8M_NjtGc5T9ZbrUansY8FcWkR17H5w
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6fb025be36bd6467/IMG_3748.jpg?part=0.4&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGdIfRDzU0NkWdOlYBvg0tFm586BlnuF19i6_SKSXhoAqYY-THPapXFLxTIJP6IwFrjvONfd395FfezHa682Yo0tRiZpEeECZ8CLxtp3lCM5-vcuiM
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6fb025be36bd6467/IMG_3750.jpg?part=0.3&view=1&vt=ANaJVrHodc2NZYKM-PVH_KfSUsFeJxyaR-v_1QBYW-Uz_Ma-7RUn86uP0y21j0lqq8p1dElXdLQEgMJ0ZjgmrjTvZfsF5Cyrd36Ua_i7z9R2viOJ0aWovQo
https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/attach/6fb025be36bd6467/IMG_3752.jpg?part=0.5&authuser=0&view=1
VOF Week: Potentilla sp-10 en-route Vasundhara falls: Potentilla sp seen en-route Vasundhara falls. Could this be Potentilla cuneata??
Date/Time: 11-08-2012 / 10:15AM.
Perhaps Potentilla cuneata
Is this Sibbaldia cuneata Syn. Potentilla cuneata....
No ..., this is different from Sibbaldia cuneata
Thanks ... for ID.

 
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(7).JPG?part=0.7&view=1&vt=ANaJVrEa2sIXytbiG1zyGv2TKiF2B2ojI3BVdM-KBCNzLo8EQUEMErm7GHzzhSvascSJEtRoHenA9Ha-OKsysnp_OIuxHOY2rRla0MdacLLOlGiJyy6Hr5Q
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(2).JPG?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGprCaPMkh1j0hspkX2ky2_36VHxIDGUuG6y-rR3rFIA0lYq4iL5DCF0yfpx1z_EJJWSWdZuyQKoyeK0YtBN0jL0Wi_1ukK3AOQZRy_kSkqoh6fShk
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(1).JPG?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGDQz7vW1HMyybfZlu_jzYBfvasJWcG_NFLDeEi1SasbhZmRsVkMG2w9fbSQkpustTtRcRR8jKmIFCJIwKYQhzo7_HW8lpI-M2vfTNCGfLhTh97ATs
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(5).JPG?part=0.5&view=1&vt=ANaJVrF8rQuprHWtwWGLhMeaY4nxEPwHgYvqaffMot08pGngWDeIqhFK8rU2SELfblRjFH0tLrO132gNqZAiGxBHYtr_yvYSFslgrrzQtR2Z1Rwc0BDM4Ww
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(3).JPG?part=0.3&view=1&vt=ANaJVrGQ3jfolO4CG_Yk59F6Pta8qbxz4b-W-8fKj9i9A_Td335t9jfbzwX1BmQB7IAre2hmSO2jY2kbnM4SEITNSjL8AhvtiJEWCQvNk7R0R6CpC1vz9FM
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(6).JPG?part=0.6&view=1&vt=ANaJVrEjQH5i7rNYiPnKP1Z4X_zrMMod_CNujVCfrbhboa8u-uhQYL7DPYWjDPcc3bzx6ofE_ZMWnpddquhuxfH-lD8HJNqNWfuZRn7QZV4UgpUFZQFoawI
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/f623d1a6f066516c/Potentilla%20cuneifolia%20(4).JPG?part=0.4&view=1&vt=ANaJVrEQwD93b0_XZ3ohq1iTpotp-T8U1D698HgV1vHHtrl3iQrifmTN1mPzs1K7E8YQnDMsCjhL-dR_YJHCmiqwZX0012cYg4bgtPbuLNVbdV7j6LMbeVc
Potentilla cuneifolia from valley
Pls validate
It needs to get straight.
First the confusion which ... also had: this plant has foliage of P. sibbaldii (now Sibbaldia cuneata) but stamens are more than 10.
Our plant is Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol (not Potentilla cuneifolia (Rydb.) T.Wolf) an accepted name), which was described as Potentilla ambigua Camb. in Flora of British India.........The new correct name for this is Potentilla cuneata Wall.
Needless to say The Plant List seems to have bungled here also putting P. cuneifolia Bertol as synonym of Sibbaldia cuneata.
Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol Syn Potentilla ambigua Camb. is this OK Sir
No ..., you did not read my note clearly
The correct name is Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm.
Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm., ; Pugill. 3: 34 (1831).
syn: Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol. (non Rydb.) T.Wolf); P. ambigua Camb,

 
 
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/4f97695d51a719dd/P.cuneifolia_DSR_2.JPG?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrEs-GvoS-1zh-Q6OEy18jMyUCYf2tl9ee_uUVr6iDswFkA4J07Y-Hmvn4W-6Z17UpOTea-tMC7FWIaxbrPR5rhlr03XivfrX__aDXEuX2LfrDjPXwQ
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/4f97695d51a719dd/P.cuneifolia_DSR_1.JPG?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrG3CPCRVCDGfIg-VuYD5umJdEfwNZhsbHyWAZudjSeZC98CTeC4Nxkx15f8gXv4kkMpZrgnMQdouWUdpw6C_gGUNFMg_4cP88431Y8r4oMdNXOTxoA
Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol. (Rosaceae) is a common Potentilla in full bloom nowadays (24.6.15) in Badrinath (3000m) in Uttarakhand.
Thanks, ...
It's taxonomy seems quite confusing:
FOP gives Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol. with Potentilla ambigua Cambess. as synonym with the following remarks:
"Potentilla ambigua Cambess. (1844) non Gaud. (1828) is an illegitimate name because Potentilla cuneata was partly taken as a synonym of Potentilla ambigua which belongs to the genus Sibbaldia L. The proper name should be Potentilla cuneifolia Bert. (1863), that being the next valid name (cf. Sojak, 1969). The species resembles the genus Sibbaldia in the trifoliate leaves and shape and texture of the leaflets (broadly obovate, tridentate and coriaceous). It is, however, readily distinguished by its numerous carpels and stamens, large suborbicular petals, very long, filiform styles and densely sericeous achenes.
Chaoluan, Ikeda & Ohba (in Zhengyi & P. H. Raven, Fl. China 9: 296. 2003) have adopted Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm."
FON gives Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol., ; Misc. 24: 15, t. 2 (1863).= Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm.
FOC gives Potentilla cuneata Wallich ex Lehmann (syn: Potentilla ambigua Cambessèdes; P. dolichopogon H. Léveillé)
As per The Plant List, Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm. is a synonym of Sibbaldia parviflora Willd. & Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol. is an unresolved name (This name is unresolved, but some data suggest that it is synonymous with Sibbaldia cuneifolia (Bertol.) Paule & Soj k (Unresolved)).
Pl. clarify.
As per thread: Vof Week: Potentilla cuneifolia from Valley, ... has clarified as below:
Our plant is Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol (not Potentilla cuneifolia (Rydb.) T.Wolf) an accepted name), which was described as Potentilla ambigua Camb. in Flora of British India.........The new correct name for this is Potentilla cuneata Wall.
Needless to say The Plant List seems to have bungled here also putting P. cuneifolia Bertol as synonym of Sibbaldia cuneata.
The correct name is Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm.:
Potentilla cuneata Wall. ex Lehm., ; Pugill. 3: 34 (1831).
syn: Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol. (non Rydb.) T.Wolf); P. ambigua Camb,
The remark by ... clarify the things here. Rosaceae of India, a standard work on Indian Rosaceae by Dikshit & Panigrahi (Ros. India 4: 67, f.9. 1998) have accepted this name as the correct name. Pusalkar & Singh (2012) in their Flora of Gangotri National Park have also used this name.
In my view it should be taken as P. cuneata Wall. ex Lehm. as in FoNepal or if we follow Indian literature only as P.cuneifolia Bertol.
Sibbaldia genus is different from it and have 4 or 5 or 10 stamens only (our species has numerous as visible in the pics) and flowers are smaller (less than 1cm across) in Indian species.

... understand nomenclatural complexities far more better than me and he has already explained it earlier as you have also mentioned.
Thanks, ...
... Would you pl. clarify in this matter ?
 
 https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/attach/18b837edd4a784/Potentilla%20eriocarpa_Chitkul.jpg?part=0.1&authuser=0
Rosaceae Fortnight- Potentilla eriocarpa from Himachal-GSG39/Sept 2015 : 6 posts by 3 authors. Attachments (1)
Potentilla eriocarpa.
Probably Potentilla ambigua.
Thanks for pointing out nomenclature issue.
I distinguished between P. cuneata Wall. ex Lehm. and P. eriocarpa Wall. ex Lehm. - both otherwise looking similar - by the glabrous and hairy cuneate leaflets respectively. Now I find that nomenclature of P. cuneata is updated/ corrected as P. cuneifolia Bertol. with P.cuneata Wall. ex Lehm. and P. ambigua Cambess. as sysnonyms.
I has uploaded images of P. cuneata (now P. cuneifolia) also. Kindly help in fixing identity.
I also find a nomenclature mix up with respect to P. atrosanguinea vs. P. argyrophyalla. I had posted flowers of 3 colours i.e. yellow, orange and red under the caption P. atrosanguinea. However, some references place yellow flowered plants under P. argyrophyalla
I shall be grateful for clarifying these issues.  
efi page on Potentilla cuneata - Potentilla cuneata Wallich ex Lehmann, Nov. Stirp. Pug. 3: 34. 1831. (syn: Potentilla ambigua Cambessèdes; Potentilla cuneifolia Bertol.; P. dolichopogon H. Léveillé) as per FOC & FON and as per efi thread
This is not p.eriocarpa it must be p.cuneata.

 
https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/attach/6c1f51218cdf4/_MG_0284_31July2016.jpg?part=0.1.1&authuser=0
https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/attach/6c1f51218cdf4/_MG_0346_31July2016.jpg?part=0.1.3&authuser=0
Potentilla cuneata ABAUG2016/28 : 4 posts by 2 authors. 3 images.
Please validate.
Potentilla cuneataFive-finger Cinquefoil
Mcleodganj-Triund, HP
2300m and above.
31 July 2016.
Loved the last one most.
I think matches with images at Potentilla cuneata
 
 
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6d99c9b4e56cb23c/Potentiala%20%20cuneata.JPG?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrFJdrK78nNqpWjia3GZTdDX3QAOlRKRzD-bMV0KLW8UufKF4qXSSZsgxuh7N-DTt9B6qG77F0DMh7_1cnRhcBk7oNjKQkMt1CTIUhBXKx3tPleNVYU

Flowers from Valley, Uttaranchal- 26/7/08. Valley of flowers - indiantreepix | Google Groups


https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6ea6109eb6056/kugti%20herb%20yellow-red%20flower%20habit.jpg?part=0.3&view=1&vt=ANaJVrG9pIwM75-xJUsEWeJLRT5eYrUtEk_Fykb2fxxxW_YRf0c3Dr8WrNd5oFbntLUsfCRpfeyUkBxDtXVNeoDj5yTX--9k0ofFmQr0MSmAoXZmCMSQTGY
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6ea6109eb6056/kugti%20herb%20yellow-red%20flower%20side.jpg?part=0.4&view=1&vt=ANaJVrESPG2ZJeAlX2ToSYZc2eLWd_EhUgC2XJrm3f-7r_9lo7omkxG1__nbFKQ6lRKju5t5Ns5CBHvew5C6QVt9T3IXGfYTzwxs1aJbumWWfDEB2LEn6yc
 
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6ea6109eb6056/kugti%20herb%20yellow-red%20flower%20flower.jpg?part=0.2&view=1&vt=ANaJVrG7Q8fEMOzZ9jPKED3DWbaN3AU3otlcsM3s_-DeSNb6TcOaNTkcOLdwxi-tsdJCWJgiKJthQoOPpkeJYvVDBNRauwE1_dKb3nhch21tzALLcMuwgFM
https://08511630493324166816.googlegroups.com/attach/6ea6109eb6056/kugti%20herb%20yellow-red%20flower%20bud.jpg?part=0.1&view=1&vt=ANaJVrF0o5wlMZ4a0Hh8z2eVw8AxslsGAFfgJHJq5TYdTQ6rX9pNL1_0NZQUSkmpgy6-5ubgo_XtAEiFAP-Y5pGrI2l4zX6YD5PAkTUMxxgbMsanQVy_l6I
Herb for ID, Kugti, Himachal Pradesh NAW-SEP17-19 : 5 posts by 4 authors. Attachments (4)
Kindly identify this herb with yellow-red flowers photographed in Chamba district on the trail to the Kugti Pass at the altitude of about 3500 metres, in June 2017.
Please check for Potentilla species here.

Potentilla cuneifolia

 
References:
Comments