What is the lesson plan: 'Balancing Free Speech and Fair Trial'?From the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts Cases that balance the First and Sixth Amendment protections of free speech and fair trial issues come to the Supreme Court in many ways. This lesson plan outlines a fictional case that judges and teachers can use to have high school students consider how to balance a criminal defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial against the constitutional rights to free speech of relatives of an alleged victim.
The key question presented by the case is this: If the friends and family of a murder victim sit in the trial of the alleged murderer wearing buttons printed with a picture of the deceased, does that prejudice the jury and risk depriving the defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury?
How do you use it?This lesson plan focusing on the tension between fair trial and free speech is divided into multiple easy-to-use parts. The "Facts and Case Summary" section is a succinct summary of the case and the "Talking Points" section sets out a number of issues raised by the case, and arguments "pro" and "con." A judge or other presenter could lead a fairly short discussion using these sections.
The lesson plan simply outlines a possible simulation exercise in the "Talking Points" section. This simulation gets the audience involved, presents relevant historical information, requires critical thinking, helps students better understand court proceedings, and is easy for judges, attorneys and teachers to follow.
The moderator/leaders/students would need to know some basic rules regarding British style debate, although guidelines for civil discussion (e.g. rules of participation) are provided.
The program calls for a targeted presentation by speakers on the various sides of the propositions for about 30 minutes, at which point the points being offered by the presenters are then opened up to the floor for input and comment. Specific arguments for and against the propositions are provided, which can stimulate discussion. A suggested timeline is provided for the 6th Amendment exercise (nearly 3 hours, but with plenty of room for compression)
Also on this uscourts.gov site under the Sixth Amendment section is an additional resource: Journalists and Grand Juries, based on the case Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646 (1972) that again balances two competing public policies: a free press and public safety (when can a reporter be compelled to reveal confidential information?).
Cautions:
If a judge or teacher decided to take on the full simulation (which would need a nearly 3-hour session), substantial prep time would be needed to become thoroughly familiar with the issues, and to enlist and prepare attorneys and students to play their parts.
The case outlined is based on a Supreme Court case, Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70, 127 S. Ct. 649 (2006). Judges who want to present these issues may find it more interesting to deal with the real case rather than this hypothetical.
Who is the audience?This lesson plan is directed at a rather sophisticated audience, at a high school or college level. It is not intended for an individual to "read," rather the lesson plan is structured so that the material can be discussed and the arguments acted out. Students are offered several opportunities to participate, which can get them excited about the issues and make them more attentive to the subject.
What other resources will complement this?From the Bill of Rights section:
From the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth Amendment Rights section:
Additional Recommended Resources | Off-Site Links
|